Gladu v. Sousa
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the plaintiffs motion for additur and ordering a new trial on the issue of damages. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff filed suit alleging negligence on the part of the defendant arising from a traffic accident that occurred in Waterbury. The defendant admitted in his answer that he was negligent in failing to keep a proper lookout for other traffic. The jury rendered a plaintiffs verdict for economic damages only, awarding her $13,650, approximately the amount of her unpaid medical bills. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Robinson v. BackesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Johnson v. FranklinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Wood v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schroeder v. Triangulum AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Gladu v. SousaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Snell v. BeamonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Gladu v. SousaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Murray v. Taylor,, No. Cv 95 0125410 S (Apr. 26, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999