Legal Opinion

Gladu v. Sousa

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 20, 1999No. AC 18205PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the plaintiffs motion for additur and ordering a new trial on the issue of damages. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The plaintiff filed suit alleging negligence on the part of the defendant arising from a traffic accident that occurred in Waterbury. The defendant admitted in his answer that he was negligent in failing to keep a proper lookout for other traffic. The jury rendered a plaintiffs verdict for economic damages only, awarding her $13,650, approximately the amount of her unpaid medical bills. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Robinson v. BackesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  4. Johnson v. FranklinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Wood v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Triangulum AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Gladu v. SousaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Snell v. BeamonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Gladu v. SousaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Murray v. Taylor,, No. Cv 95 0125410 S (Apr. 26, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API