Legal Opinion

Salaman v. City of Waterbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 3, 1997No. SC 15653PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 211 (AC 14709), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had improperly set aside the verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff because the plaintiff had failed to establish that (1) the city owed a duty to the plaintiffs decedent and (2) that the city had breached any such duty?
“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had granted the city’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Salaman v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Salaman v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Parasco v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API