Rauer v. Rynd
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. B. V. Sargent, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought, on September 21, 1911, to secure possession of a Simplex automobile with damages for its detention and resulted in a judgment for plaintiff. The history of the whole litigation concerning said machine is quite varied and has given rise to certain questions somewhat out of the ordinary. On December 24, 1910, B. F. Rynd, Jr., one of the defendants herein, brought suit in replevin in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco to recover possession of said machine from Rauer’s Law and Collection Company. Under a writ of replevin, Thomas J. Finn, the sheriff…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gray v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Lamb v. WahlenmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Emma Silver Mining Co. v. Emma Silver Mining Co. of New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880
- Riciotto v. ClementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Parnell v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Adrian L. Cristobal v. Jeffrey SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Travis Glass Co. v. IbbetsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Hardy v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hougham v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.