Parnell v. Hahn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Wilson, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court :
An opinion in this case was filed in Department One, on the tenth day of April, 1882 (9 P. C. L. J. 370), which is adopted as the opinion of the Court in bank. (See also Ressequie v. Byers, 52 Wis. 650, and cases therein cited.)
Judgment affirmed.
The following is the opinion of Department One, referred to.
McKee, J.:
This was an action to recover damages for breach of an alleged contract for the sale of real estate. In answering the complaint in the action the defendant, among other pleas, pleaded a former judgment in bar of the action. Upon the trial of that issue the Court below…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Phelan v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Ressequie v. ByersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by19 opinions
- Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Benson v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Wehle v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Taylor v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Hardy v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.