Riciotto v. Clement
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
Appeal from judgment and order refusing a new trial.
This is an action of claim and delivery to recover possession of two horses, which plaintiff alleges defendant “ still unlawfully withholds and detains.”
The pleadings were verified, and the defendant, in his answer, denies that he “ unlawfully withholds or detains or detained said goods and chattels.” For a further and separate defense he admits the taking, and attempts to justify, as constable, under a writ of attachment against one Smith, as whose property they were taken. He avers that judgment passed against Smith in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nichols v. . MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Washburn v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Aber v. BrattonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Hall v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Haughton v. . NewberrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Faulkner v. First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Liver v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Dow v. DempseyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Largilliere Co., Bankers v. KunzIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.