Legal Opinion

Riciotto v. Clement

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1892No. 14378PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

Appeal from judgment and order refusing a new trial.

This is an action of claim and delivery to recover possession of two horses, which plaintiff alleges defendant “ still unlawfully withholds and detains.”

The pleadings were verified, and the defendant, in his answer, denies that he “ unlawfully withholds or detains or detained said goods and chattels.” For a further and separate defense he admits the taking, and attempts to justify, as constable, under a writ of attachment against one Smith, as whose property they were taken. He avers that judgment passed against Smith in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nichols v. . MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. Washburn v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Aber v. BrattonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hall v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Haughton v. . NewberrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Faulkner v. First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Liver v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Dow v. DempseyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Largilliere Co., Bankers v. KunzIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API