Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Wahlenmaier

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1904No. L.A. No. 1233PublishedCited by 48 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, C.

The plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant Wahlenmaier for the construction of a building in Los Angeles at the agreed price of $6,277, and at the same time Wahlenmaier and his co-defendant, the Fidelity and Deposit Company, of Maryland, as his surety, executed a bond to the plaintiff for the faithful performance by him of his contract. The bond provided that Wahlenmaier should also cancel and release the building from all claims or liens that might accrue against it from the performance of the contract, and should save the plaintiff herein harmless from all damage…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Collins v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Chouteau v. GibsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  3. South & North Alabama Railroad v. Henlein & BarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Thompson v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Laidlaw v. MaryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Martin v. HolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API