Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Spring Hope v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

In the consent judgment of 31 October, 1925, signed by J. N. Sills, C. S. C., it was expressly agreed: “That in order to make assets- to pay the indebtedness of the estate of the said S. 0. Edwards, it is necessary that the first tract be sold,” etc.

The judgment of 12 December, 1925, which says: “To pay the proceeds of sale to the plaintiff to the extent of the plaintiff’s indebtedness as alleged in the complaint, in satisfaction of the plaintiff’s alleged equitable lien upon the property sold,” is contrary to the plain language of the consent judgment.

Walker, J., in Massey v. Barbee, 138 N.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Edney v. . EdneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Vaughan Barnes v. . Gooch and PrescottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. Hardin v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Morris v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. McArthur v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Ellis v. . EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Cason v. . ShuteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API