Legal Opinion

Cason v. . Shute

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It is apparent that on the hearing the matter became entangled in the net of form. This ought not to deprive the parties of their rights.

On the question of recalling the execution, Williams v. Dunn, 158 N. C., 399, 74 S. E., 99; S. c., 163 N. C., 206, 79 S. E., 512, and whether plaintiff consented to the judgment of 1931, Morgan v. Hood, Comr., ante, 91, the proper procedure is by motion in the cause. Deitz v. Bolch, 209 N. C., 202, 183 S. E., 384; Bank v. Penland, 206 N. C., 323, 173 S. E., 345; Register Co. v. Holton, 200 N. C., 478, 157 S. E., 433; Weir v. Weir, 196 N. C., 268, 145 S. E.,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Henry v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Gardiner v. . MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Edney v. . EdneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Rodriguez v. . RodriguezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Webster v. . WebsterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API