Legal Opinion

Keen v. Parker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1940PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

These are tbe decisive questions on this appeal:

1. Where it appears upon tbe face of tbe record that, in a special proceeding for partition of remainder in land subject to life estates, instituted by some of tbe remaindermen, including a married woman and her husband, with whom tbe life tenants join, as petitioners, against tbe other remaindermen, a married woman and her husband, as defendants, no issue of fact as to tbe respective interests of tbe parties being raised by tbe pleading, tbe clerk of Superior Court enters a judgment recited to be “by consent of all parties,” but only signed by…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Henry v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Prevatt v. Harrelson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API