Legal Opinion

Vaughan Barnes v. . Gooch and Prescott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1885PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Motion to re-open biddings and order a resale of lands, heard before Qudger, Judge, at Fall Term, 1884, of Halifax Superior Court. His Honor refused the motion, and the defendant Gooch appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

This action is instituted for foreclosure, by-sale of the land mentioned in the complaint, which had been conveyed by mortgage deed from the defendant Prescott to the defendant Gooch, to secure the payment of certain notes under seal executed to the latter, and which Gooch has assigned together with the mortgage, to the plaintiffs, as collateral security for his own indebtedness to them.

The summons was duly issued and served upon both defendants, and at the return term thereof a judgment was entered in these words:

“ This cause coming on to be heard, and it being made to appear to the court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mebane v. . MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. McEachern v. . KerchnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. A. H. Stump & Sons v. LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Edney v. . EdneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  5. Pritchard v. . AskewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Gardiner v. . MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Bunn v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API