Ellis v. . Ellis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
Is the consent judgment, March Term, 1925, in compromise and settlement of the differences existing between the plaintiff and the defendant void?
Unquestionably, “a void judgment is without life or force, and the court will quash it on motion, or ex mero motu. Indeed, when it appears to be void, it may and will be ignored everywhere, and treated as a mere nullity.” Carter v. Rountree, 109 N. C., 29; Moore v. Packer, 174 N. C., 665; Reynolds v. Cotton Mills, 177 N. C., 412.
It will be observed that the judgment sought to be vacated is a consent judgment. “A judgment or decree entered by consent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Moore v. . PackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Ellis v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Bunn v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Dyer v. . DyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.