Legal Opinion
Willard v. Hagemeister
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 1981No. Docket Nos. 60184, 59108PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, Acting P. J.
In these consolidated appeals, plaintiff and appellant, Faye L. Willard, seeks reversal of summary judgments in a dental malpractice action entered in favor of defendants and respondents Carl R. Hagemeister, D.D.S., Dennis R. Hardin, D.D.S., Jeffrey D. Waterman, D.D.S., Stanley G. Eichstaedt, D.D.S., and Stanley G. Eichstaedt, Inc. The issue before this court is whether a disputed question of fact exists as to either the alleged negligence of respondents in providing dental care for appellant, or the purported misrepresentations made to her regarding the dental…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Landeros v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Smeltzley v. Nicholson Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Barbara P. Hutchinson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Malmstrom v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Medina Santiago v. VélezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. City of TurlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Jambazian v. BordenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.