Legal Opinion
Malmstrom v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 1986No. A030073PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENSON, J.
Carl M. Malmstrom appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted the motion for summary judgment of his former employer, Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, to the first and second causes of action of the first amended complaint. We affirm the judgment.
I
Pleading and Procedural Background
The first cause of action of the first amended complaint for breach of contract alleges breach of an implied contract to employ Malmstrom until his retirement, subject only to discharge for cause. It also alleges breach of Kaiser’s written policies concerning placement and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Schneider v. TRW, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Martin v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Consumer Advocates v. Echostar Satellite Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Kruse v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.