Legal Opinion

Sinz v. Owens

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1949No. Sac. 5982PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

A jury returned a verdict for $17,500 in favor of Rudy Sinz for damages occasioned by the medical treatment of Dr. Raymond L. Owens. Subsequently, the physician’s motion for a new trial was denied upon condition that Sinz consent to a reduction in the amount of damages to $10,000. Sinz refused to accept the reduction and a new trial was granted on the issue of damages alone. Dr. Owens has appealed from the judgment and Sinz has filed a cross-appeal from the order granting a new trial.

As the result of a traffic accident, Sinz sustained a double comminuted fracture of the tibia and fibula of…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Engelking v. CarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Benson v. . DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Houghton v. DicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API