Legal Opinion

Palma v. Leslie

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1935No. Civ. 5265PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODWARD, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff, Ferdinand Palma, appeals from a judgment denying him the relief sought, and decreeing the reformation of a certain deed as prayed for by defendants in their cross-complaint. Originally, appellant’s action was instituted for the purpose of obtaining a vendor’s lien upon real property conveyed by him to respondents, pursuant to the terms of a contract of exchange. After the complaint had been amended several times the parties ultimately filed a written stipulation, wherein appellant waived his right to the specific lien demanded, and agreed, in lieu thereof,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Lassing v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Calpetro Producers Syndicate v. Chas M. Woods Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Payne v. Pathe Studios, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. California Electric Works, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Lundin v. Hallmark Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. People v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Sand v. Concrete Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Joint Holdings & Trading Co. v. First Union National Bank of North CarolinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API