Calpetro Producers Syndicate v. Chas M. Woods Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
This is an action upon an implied guaranty of title upon the sale of personal property. Defendant had judgment. Plaintiffs have appealed.
The appeal is determined by the proper application of a rule of evidence. Plaintiffs purchased from the defendant upon April 6, 1923, under a written conditional sales contract, certain oil-drilling machinery, which contract not only on its face shows that the writing contained all the terms and conditions of sale and purchase, but in it is found a clause making this fact certain, which reads as follows:
“It is expressly understood this proposal made in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Johnson v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Peterson v. ChaixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Stanley Clayman and Melvin Clayman v. Goodman Properties, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Buffalo Arms, Inc. v. Remler Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Schied v. Bodinson Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.