Legal Opinion
Hill v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 1935No. Civ. 1744PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is a proceeding to review an order of the Industrial Accident Commission awarding Lulu Vickers compensation against T. L. Hill for injuries sustained in the course of and arising out of her employment by Hill, and discharging from liability the National Automobile Insurance Company, the purported insurance carrier for Hill. For brevity we will refer to the Industrial Accident Commission as the commission, and the National Automobile Insurance Company as the company.
It is admitted that Mrs. Vickers was the employee of Hill, that she was injured in the course of her employment and that her…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Harrigan v. Home Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Rosenberg v. Geo. A. Moore & Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Keith v. Electrical Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Witherow v. United American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tarleton v. De VeuveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Ohran v. National Automobile Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Gandelman v. Mercantile Ins. Co. Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Vyn v. Northwest Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Argonaut Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.