Legal Opinion
Gandelman v. Mercantile Ins. Co. Of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1951No. 12606_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a summary judgment denying appellant a recovery on two separate policies of fire insurance alleged to have been in effect on April 11, 1947, at which time appellant suffered the loss of his entire stock of merchandise. A signed statement of facts was filed. The question presented is whether there is a material fact in dispute which, if resolved in favor of appellant, could support the conclusion that there existed a valid contract, binding on appellees. For the reasons hereinafter stated we reach the conclusion that the question must be answered in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ellison v. Jackson Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Watkins v. ClemmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Crawford v. Transatlantic Fire Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Anderson v. Calaveras Central Mining Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Hill v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Jacques Arley and Charlotte Arley, Husband and Wife v. United Pacific Insurance Company, a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Smith v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Parlier Fruit Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Ness v. National Indemnity Company of NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.