Legal Opinion
Harrigan v. Home Life Insurance Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 1900No. S.F. No. 1658PublishedCited by 37 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinions of the court in Bank and in Department.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Action on an insurance policy. The defendant is a New York corporation. A nonsuit was granted in the court below, and judgment went for defendant, from which, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals. The motion for a nonsuit was upon these grounds: 1. That it does not appear that any premiums were paid after the first annual premium; 2. That it appears affirmatively that no such premiums were ever tendered; and 3. That the action is barred by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Olcott v. . the Tioga Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Pierce v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- King v. National M. & E. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1881
- Lawrence v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Frandzen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by37 opinions
- Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bogart v. George K. Porter Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Narver v. California State Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Seelenfreund v. Terminix of Northern California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Blair v. New York Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.