Legal Opinion

People v. Lesser

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1932No. Docket No. 2152PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.

The defendant was charged in an information filed by the district attorney with the commission of seven felonies. The first count of the information alleged the crime of grand theft, while the remaining six counts charged defendant with a violation of the Corporate Securities Act, in that he acted as a broker in the sale of stock of the Hollywood Business Properties, a corporation, without being licensed by the commissioner of corporations as a broker. The defendant was found guilty by the jury of the charge of grand theft and on five of the six counts of violation of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. People v. PaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Ex Parte QuargCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. People v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. GoetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Asher v. IngelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API