Legal Opinion

People v. Jordan

California Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1884No. 10,905PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, sustaining a demurrer to the indictment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMorrison, C. J.

The principal grounds on which defendant based his motion to dismiss the appeal, have already been considered and overruled by the court. (65 Cal. 644.)

But there is another ground not heretofore considered, on which the defendant asks that the appeal in this case may be dismissed, and that is, because section 1240 of the Penal Code has not been complied with. That section provides that an appeal is taken by filing with the clerk of the court a notice of appeal, and serving a copy thereof on the attorney of the adverse party.

The contention here is, that the notice of appeal in the case now…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Woodcock v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
  3. Bass v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. SchmitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. State v. BokienWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Haines v. TerritoryWyoming Supreme Court · 1887
  4. People v. WasservogleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Addington v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API