Legal Opinion

Asher v. Ingels

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 8, 1936No. 814PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

The 1935 session of the California Legislature enacted a statute known as chapter 527 of the Statutes of 1935 (page 1605), which was also codified by the same Legislature as sections 146, 146.5, 180.5, and 371.5 of the California Vehicle Code (St.1935, pp. 109, 116, 147). These sections are as follows:

“146. Application for Registration of Vehicle Previously Registered Outside This State, (a) Upon application for registration of a vehicle previously registered outside this State, the application shall be verified and shall also state such fact and the time and place of…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Glicker v. Michigan Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  2. Nuckols v. AtheyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. PateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Morf v. IngelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
  5. Silas Mason Co. v. HennefordDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API