Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Quarg

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1906No. Crim. No. 1316PublishedCited by 41 opinions

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS to the Chief of Police of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The act of March 18,1905, added a new section to the Penal Code, numbered 526, which reads as follows; “Every person who sells or offers for sale any ticket or tickets to any theater or other public place of amusement at a price in excess of that charged originally by the management of such theater or public place of amusement is guilty of a misdemeanor.” (Stats. 1905, p. 140, c. 140.) The petitioner is in custody upon conviction of a violation of this section, and seeks a discharge on the ground that the provisions of the section are unconstitutional, and consequently that the judgment of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greenberg v. Western Turf Assn.California Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Manufactured Housing Communities v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. PaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. SteeleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Kirtley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1949

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API