Miley Petroleum Corp., Ltd. v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment in favor of defendants. In this action plaintiff sought cancellation of assignments of oil leases on property in the North Dome of the Kettleman Hills oil fields in Kings County, cancellation of a mortgage, and of a drilling agreement providing for the development of the leases, upon the ground that the documents constituted a single contract which was usurious and void. Plaintiff also sought an accounting and damages.
The facts presented by the record are involved but it will only be necessary to detail such of them as will sufficiently explain the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Clemens v. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Andrews v. ReidyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Calimpco, Inc. v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- McConnell v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Thomassen v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Arneill Ranch v. PetitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Schiff v. PruittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.