Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Reidy

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1936No. L. A. 14861PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Leonard J. Meyberg and Paul M. Joseph for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The plaintiffs, Charles L. Andrews and Anna L. Andrews, his wife, were the owners of a promissory note for $31,000 secured by a mortgage on real property. They borrowed from a bank the sum of $6,000, and gave said note as security, and made a written assignment to the bank of the mortgage. They defaulted in the payment of their interest on the note to the bank, and the bank instituted foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage. That action proceeded to judgment, and a commissioner was appointed by the court to sell the mortgaged property under the decree of foreclosure. The plaintiffs were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bingham v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Quirk v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Sullivan v. Triunfo Gold & Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Andrews v. ReidyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Allen v. Cal. Mut. Bldg & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McLaughlin Land & Livestock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Nuckolls v. Bank of California, National Assn.California Supreme Court · 1936

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API