Stockton Lumber Co. v. Schuler
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Five actions for the foreclosure of mechanics’ liens were consolidated for trial. The building affected by the proceedings was one erected by the defendant Brown, as contractor, upon property owned by the defendant Schuler, pursuant to a contract entered, into between them. The plaintiff in each of the five actions proceeded upon the theory that the contract was void. The owner asserted the validity of the contract, and the court found in his favor on this point. As to all the lien claimants except one, a nonsuit was granted on motion of the owner, on the ground that they had failed to prove…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ward v. . KilpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Wilson v. NugentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Gibbs v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Stimson Mill Company v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Distefano v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Fairbanks v. Crump Irrigation & Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Jarvis v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Roberts v. SpiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Michal v. AdairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.