Legal Opinion
Fairbanks v. Crump Irrigation & Supply Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 11, 1930No. Docket No. 439PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAINES, J., pro tem.
On August 22, 1927, the Crump Irrigation and Supply Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “the contractor,” contracted in writing with plaintiff and respondent Douglas Fairbanks to perform and provide the labor and materials and carry out the work of constructing for Fairbanks on a ranch belonging to him in San Diego County an overhead horticultural sprinkling system, for the total contract price of $26,000, of which $5,000 was payable on the completion, according to the specifications, of the ditching, besides which, on the first day of each month while the work was…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Wasco Co. v. New England Equitable Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Donnelly v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ralphs v. HenslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Yanchor v. KaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- First National Bank v. Pomona Tile Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Thomas v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.