Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Spires

California Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1925No. Docket No. L.A. 7890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

The defendant and cross-complainant, Mary H. Spires, has alone appealed from a portion of the judgment in the above-entitled consolidated lien ease. The appeal is on the judgment-roll alone.

The appellant entered into a contract with the plaintiff and respondent Roberts for the erection of a two-story, class A building on property owned by her in the city of Los Angeles. The contractor agreed to supply all labor and materials required for the construction of the building at a price of $190,000, subject to necessary adjustments for extras or omissions made in accordance with the terms of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hampton v. ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Stockton Lumber Co. v. SchulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. J. J. Henry Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. Fairbanks v. Crump Irrigation & Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Appel v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API