Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gomez v. Campbell

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1965No. 7678PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Chief Justice.

In this original proceeding in mandamus, relators seek to require the governor and eleven state boards or commissions to return, and thereafter maintain, the main offices of the agencies at the capital and not elsewhere.

The fundamental question involved relates-to the meaning of art. V, § 1, of^ the New Mexico Constitution, i. e., whether the constitution makes it mandatory that all officers of the executive department maintain their offices at the capital.

All of the respondents, other than The Honorable Jack M. Campbell, Governor, are duly appointed state and public…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lemon v. LanglieWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Asplund v. HannettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Asplund v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State Ex Rel. Burg v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Udall v. Colonial Penn InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Doe v. MaherConnecticut Superior Court · 1986
  4. State v. BallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Castillo Corp. v. New Mexico State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API