Legal Opinion
Asplund v. Hannett
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 1926No. 3101PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WATSON, J.
By the act of June 21, 1898, known as the Ferguson Act [30 Stat. 484], Congress made numerous. grants of land for various purposes to the territory of New Mexico. Some of these were of specific lands, and others were of lands to be selected. Among these grants was one of 500,000 acres to be selected “for the establishment of permanent water reservoirs for irrigating purposes..” As to the lands in question, it was provided that the same might be selected and sold under certain named restrictions, and that:
“All money received on account of such sales, after…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- Crampton v. ZabriskieSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Vigil v. ArzolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- American Civil Liberties Union v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Ethington v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. PattenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.