Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Castillo Corp. v. New Mexico State Tax Commission

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1968No. 8657PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARMODY, Justice.

We issued our alternative writ of mandamus, directing that the respondents perform the duties enjoined upon them by art. VIII, § 1, of the New Mexico Constitution and § 72-6-12.1, N.M.S.A.19S3, by determining, fixing and promulgating a uniform assessment percentage ratio to be used in all counties of the State for the year 1968.

The question presented is whether there is a clear legal duty requiring the State Tax Commission to promulgate an order providing for a uniform assessment percentage ratio to be used in all counties for State purposes as to ad valorem taxes.

I

Befo…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Switz v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Asplund v. HannettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State Ex Rel. Burg v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Skinner v. New Mexico State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Giles v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. El Dorado at Santa Fe, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. HeimNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API