Legal Opinion
Doe v. Maher
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided April 9, 1986No. File 196874PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
The plaintiffs, Rosie J. Doe and her physician, Marshall Holley, 1 have brought this class action against the defendant commissioner of income maintenance (commissioner) 2 challenging the legality and constitutionality of Policy 275 of 3 Manual, Department of Income Maintenance Medical Assistance Program, c. III. (Revised January 22, 1981) (regulation). 3 The regulation restricts the funding of abortions under the Connecticut Medical Assistance Program (hereinafter medicaid); General Statutes § 17-134a et seq.; to those abortions “necessary because the life of the mother would be endangered…
2Cases cited114 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.