Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mika GERGEN, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1999No. 97-30324PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAKASUGI, Senior District Judge:

Mika Gergen (“Gergen”) appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for violating 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d), arguing that the Supreme Court’s holding in Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600, 114 S.Ct. 1793, 128 L.Ed.2d 608 (1994), requires the government to prove that he knew of the particular characteristics of the shotgun which made the shotgun illegal under the National Firearms Act (the “Act”). Ger-gen maintains that the district court erroneously removed the mens rea element required under the Act, that the jury was not presented with sufficient evidence…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. United States v. Leo BishopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Alfredo Gracidas-UlibarryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Francisco Jimenez Recio, United States of America v. Adrian Lopez-MezaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Michael H. Boulware, United States of America v. Michael H. BoulwareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. Mark Kevin HicksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. PerlazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API