Legal Opinion
United States v. Mark Kevin Hicks
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 31, 2000No. 99-10352PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Mark Kevin Hicks was convicted by a jury of making false statements to a federally insured financial institution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014. On appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, that the jury instructions were inadequate, that the district court erred in admitting certain evidence, and that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm the judgment of conviction, but vacate the sentence and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS •
We recount the relevant facts in the manner most favorable…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. David Guillette and Robert JoostCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. FregaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Donaciano Hernandez-EscarsegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Wei Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc., Delaware Corporation McMi Food Company, a Texas Corporation Harry Lees, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ginny v. White Jimmie D. White v. Ford Motor Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Orscheln Company, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.