Legal Opinion

Staples v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 23, 1994No. 92-1441PublishedCited by 1,333 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

The National Firearms Act makes it unlawful for any person to possess a machinegun that is not properly registered with the Federal Government. Petitioner contends that, to convict him under the Act, the Government should have been required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew the weapon he possessed had the characteristics that brought it within the statutory definition of a machinegun. We agree and accordingly reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

I

The National Firearms Act (Act), 26 U. S. C. §§5801-5872, imposes strict registration requirements on statutorily defined…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,333 opinions

  1. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

1,328 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API