Legal Opinion

United States v. Leo Bishop

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1992No. 89-50560PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge:

With this case, we are called upon to examine the boundaries of the Supreme Court’s decision in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). Appellant Leo Bishop alleges that the prosecutor in his criminal trial unconstitutionally exercised a peremptory challenge to exclude a prospective black juror on the basis of her race. The prosecutor explained the challenge as based in part on the fact the black juror lived in a predominantly low-income, black neighborhood and was therefore likely to believe the police “pick on black people.” We must…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. United States v. David Dominic NecoecheaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API