Legal Opinion

Jones v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 2011No. 61 EAP 2010PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

We granted review in this case to consider an issue of first impression regarding the legality of an insurance compa*222njfs practice of reimbursing, on a pro rata basis only, an insured’s deductible from funds obtained in an insurer’s subrogation action against a third-party tortfeasor. The insured argues that this practice violates the common law “made whole doctrine.” As discussed in more detail below, the made whole doctrine provides generally that an insurance company cannot exercise its right of subrogation until its insured has been fully compensated or “made whole.” As…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chandler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Bilt-Rite Contractors, Inc. v. Architectural StudioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Allstate Insurance v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Ario v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. AAA Mid-Atlantic Insurance v. RyanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Professional Flooring Co. v. Bushar Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Lauri Daniels v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API