Legal Opinion

Chandler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 17, 2010No. 09-55123PublishedCited by 418 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its published opinion at 596 F.Supp.2d 1314 (C.D.Cal.2008), attached as Appendix A.

AFFIRMED.

APPENDIX A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Stuart Chandler, Plaintiff, v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Defendant.

Case No. CV 08-03184 GAF (Ex)

ORDER & MEMORANDUM REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS

I. INTRODUCTION

This putative class action presents the Court with the question whether an insur er is permitted to recoup a payout from a third-party tortfeasor’s insurance company before the insured has…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by418 opinions

  1. Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Carijano v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  4. In re iPhone Application Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  5. In re Adobe Systems, Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

413 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API