Legal Opinion

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. City of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 2014PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice McCAFFERY.

We granted review in this ease principally to clarify the standard for determining whether a municipal ordinance applies to an agency or instrumentality of the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth Court concluded here that the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”) is a Commonwealth agency and therefore not subject to either the provisions of the Philadelphia Fair Practices Ordinance (“FPO”),1 or the jurisdiction of the Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations (“the Philadelphia Commission”). The Commonwealth Court also concluded that, because SEPTA…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. Ogontz Area Neighbors Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth State Emp. Ret. System v. Dau. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Empire Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Snyder Bros., Inc. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Eleven Eleven Pennsylvania, LLC v. Commonwealth, State Board of CosmetologyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. City of Philadelphia v. LernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Pa. Rest. & Lodging Ass'n v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. County of Berks v. PA OOR and ALDEA - The People's Justice CenterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API