Bilt-Rite Contractors, Inc. v. Architectural Studio
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice CASTILLE.
This appeal raises the first impression question of whether a building contractor may maintain a negligent misrepresentation claim against an architect for alleged misrepresentations in the architect’s plans for a public construction contract, where there was no privity of contract between the architect *457and the contractor, but the contractor reasonably relied upon the misrepresentations in submitting its winning bid and consequently suffered purely economic damages as a result of that reliance. The Superior Court found as a matter of law that, absent privity of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Bortz v. NoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by234 opinions
- Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- R.W. v. ManzekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Azur v. Chase Bank, USA, National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Commonwealth v. Golden Gate Nat'l Senior Care LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.