Legal Opinion

Ario v. Reliance Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 2009No. 3 MAP 2008PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GREENSPAN.

We evaluate Section 544 of the Insurance Department Act, 40 P.S. § 221.44 (the “Act”) and determine what priority classification ought to be assigned to a subrogation claim held by an insurance company against an insolvent insurer under the Act. We hold that this type of claim is a loss claim for which the loss has been indemnified and therefore that the appropriate classification is set forth in subsection (g) of Section 533 of the Act. We therefore reverse the holding of the Commonwealth Court which improperly adopted a referee’s determination that the appropriate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. ShifflerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Stilp v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Johnson v. BeaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Koken v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. William Penn School District v. Pennsylvania Department of EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Morgan ex rel. Mumma v. Petroleum Products Equipment Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Office of the Lieutenant Governor v. MohnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. Blakeney, H., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Jones v. Nationwide Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API