Legal Opinion

Lauri Daniels v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 16, 2018No. 75727-0PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON LAZURI DANIELS, individually, and on ) behalf of all those similarly situated ) ) No. 75727-0-1 Appellant, ) DIVISION ONE v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) PUBLISHED OPINION Respondent. ) FILED: July 16, 2018 SPEARMAN, J. — When interpreting a term or phrase in an insurance contract, we view the term or phrase in the context of the entire contract and not in isolation. We consider the insurance policy as a whole, giving the policy a fair, reasonable, and sensible construction as would be given to the contract by the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Chandler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daniels v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Daniels v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API