Legal Opinion

Young v. Gardner-Denver Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1966No. Civ. 11179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRegan, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion (1) to expunge the judgment entered on October 1, 1964; (2) to enter judgment nunc pro tunc on the date of September 25, 1964; (3) to correct nunc pro tunc the order granting the motion for a stay of judgment; and (4) to vacate the “void" order granting defendants’ motion for new trial.

We have reviewed the record. That portion of Appellant’s Opening Brief entitled “Facts" appearing at pages 2, 3 and 4 of that brief, and that portion of Bespondents’ Beply Brief entitled “Pacts” appearing at pages 2 and 3 of that brief accurately summarize the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Mather v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Lámar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Meyer v. PorathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Viejo Bancorp, Inc. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Savage v. BoothWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Dakota Payphone, LLC v. AlcarazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Williamson v. Plant Insulation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Kellogg v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API