Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Porath

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 23, 1952No. Civ. 8165PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This appeal is taken from an order made by the trial court amending nunc pro tunc its antecedent findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment. On January 31, 1949, plaintiff and respondent brought action against defendants and appellants to have it decreed that plaintiff was the owner of a right of way for road purposes over the lands of appellants. The right of way was described as being “a roadway which is now marked out across” appellants’ land, approximately 12 feet in width, and commencing on the westerly line of the servient tenement at a point “approximately” 850 feet north of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bastajian v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Lámar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Kohlstedt v. HauseurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Benway v. BenwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Eckstrom v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Nacht v. NachtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. In Re RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Muller v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API