Dakota Payphone, LLC v. Alcaraz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAMIREZ P. J.
Defendant Hugo Alcaraz (Alcaraz) appeals from the trial court’s entry of a default judgment against him, claiming that the default should be set aside because it was obtained through the mistake, fraud and *498collusion of his former attorneys. (Code Civ. Proc.,1 § 473, subd. (b).) Plaintiff Dakota Payphone, LLC (Dakota), appeals from the trial court’s order purporting to grant, in part, Alcaraz’s motion for a new trial, asserting that the trial court had lost jurisdiction to make such a ruling. Dakota also asserts that Alcaraz’s appeal is untimely and should be dismissed. We…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Ochoa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lister v. Bowen CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Sanchez v. StricklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Garibotti v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Ellis v. Ellis CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
- S.H. v. M.M. (In re C.E.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.