Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Plant Insulation Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1994No. A057581PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

Plant Insulation Company (Plant) appeals from a judgment against it and in favor of Evea Merle Williamson, individually and as special administrator of the estate of Wash Chapel Williamson, for $1,067,041.90 in damages arising from Wash Williamson’s exposure to asbestos-containing products distributed by Plant. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

Facts

Wash Williamson’s Employment, Exposure and Illnesses

Wash Williamson worked at the Chevron refinery in Richmond from 1947, the same year he married Evea Williamson, until 1982, first as a laborer, then as a helper, a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. OvermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Estate of PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Kellogg v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Overly v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API