Legal Opinion
Carl Ingalls, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 9, 1934No. Civ. No. 1269PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The plaintiff, who was engaged in the trucking business in Bakersfield, contracted with the Southern California Edison Company to haul a quantity of flume iron from Bakersfield to Borel. Between those points there is a winding mountain road. Before beginning the work the plaintiff secured from the defendant an insurance policy denominated 11 Trip Transit Insurance” covering the transportation of this material between the places named.
While one load was being hauled a portion of the flume iron was damaged under the following circumstances: The truck and trailer upon, which the material was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Granger v. New Jersey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Moblad v. Western Indemnity Co. of DallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Meyerstein v. Great American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by23 opinions
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Thompson v. EzzellWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Barreras v. SantanaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
- Jack v. Standard Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Chemstrand Corp. v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.