Legal Opinion
Moblad v. Western Indemnity Co. of Dallas
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1921No. Civ. No. 3797PublishedCited by 24 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
The only question presented upon this appeal is as to the construction of the following clause of a policy of insurance: “In consideration of an additional premium of $50, this policy is hereby extended to indemnify the assured against loss or damage to any automobile described in the schedule of statements, including operating equipment while attached thereto, .if caused solely by collision with another object, while such automobile is used as described in said schedule. ...” The plaintiff and appellant was the owner of the automobile covered by said policy of insurance. The automobile was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bell v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Stuht v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Wettengel v. United States "Lloyds"Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by24 opinions
- Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Continental Casualty Co. v. PaulSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Unkelsbee v. Homestead Fire Insurance Co. of BaltimoreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Carl Ingalls, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Southern Casualty Co. v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1922
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.