Harris v. Harris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.
Ordinarily, a final order for alimony without divorce terminates an order for subsistence pendente lite. Yow v. Yow, 243 N.C. 79, 89 S.E. 2d 867. Likewise, when the facts are investigated and findings made as a guide to the court in making temporary allowances, they do not affect the ultimate rights of the parties at the final hearing. Peele v. Peele, 216 N.C. 298, 4 S.E. 2d 616.
On the other hand, when the court on the final hearing finds facts based on the defendant’s admissions and his testimony given at the hearing, the court may determine that the relief sought by plaintiff and ordered at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Yow v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Wright v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Sguros v. SgurosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.