Sguros v. Sguros
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
The complaint states a cause of action based on abandonment under G.S. 50-16. Hence it is not necessary to allege with particularity acts and conduct as required when the cause is based on such indignities to the person as to render the condition intolerable and life burdensome. See Caddell v. Caddell, 236 N.C. 686, 73 S.E. 2d 923; Allen v. Allen, 244 N.C. 446, 94 S.E. 2d 325; Ollis v. Ollis, 241 N.C. 709, 86 S.E. 2d 420. The evidence before the court is sufficient to sustain the court’s finding of abandonment and the suitability of the plaintiff to have custody of the children. Likewise the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caddell v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Yow v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Fogartie v. FogartieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Wright v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Teague v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Bowes v. BowesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Wachacha v. WachachaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.